Deployment registry

Real HVAC proofLive deployments

A small set of verified deployments shows how supervisory AI adapts to existing cooling plants, operating constraints, and contractual baselines without turning this page into a broad market taxonomy.

Primary case // 001

Pharmaceutical Cooling Plant

Read the full case
Plant efficiency improvement
12.11%
AI operating period
37 days
Average plant efficiency
0.74 -> 0.65 kW/ton

Operating challenge

The plant used fixed or manually selected condenser-side frequencies, leaving pump and tower operation away from the lowest-energy point under changing weather and load.

Optimization approach

AI control adjusted condenser-water pump frequency and cooling-tower fan frequency inside defined bounds, with group-control and AI modes kept switchable.

Verified outcome

The measurement dataset compares the AI period against baseline operation and shows a 12.11% average plant efficiency improvement.

Verified fleet performance logs

Government office cooling plant

Government Office Cooling Plant

A compact office plant used AI supervisory control to optimize pump frequencies and chiller leaving-water temperature during alternating operation.

Read the full case
Energy savings result
16.81%
Average daily savings
239.77 kWh
Total measured savings
2,397.71 kWh

Hospital cooling plant

Hospital Cooling Plant

A mixed chiller plant used API-connected AI control to reduce comparable daily plant energy while keeping weather conditions close.

Read the full case
Energy reduction
32.18%
Baseline daily energy
3,470.24 kWh
AI daily energy
2,353.38 kWh

Solar manufacturing cooling plant

Solar Manufacturing Cooling Plant

A large industrial cooling plant with heat recovery was evaluated through comparable days matched by weather, production, and load.

Read the full case
Average savings
21.29%
20-day comparable result
24.51%
Cooling towers
17

Regional energy center

Regional Energy Center

A shared chilled-water and ice-storage plant used supervisory optimization to balance load swings, tariff windows, and equipment staging.

Comparable-day savings
10.12%
Monthly power-cost reduction
CNY 150K
Asset inventory
7 chillers / 12 towers

High-comfort venue hotel

High-Comfort Venue Hotel

A comfort-critical hotel plant used hard operating guardrails and local deployment to reduce tuning risk.

Deployment tuning
28 days
Recorded plant efficiency
0.55 kW/ton
Safety boundary
Hard guardrails

Data center cold plant

Data Center Cold Plant

A three-chiller data center plant used coordinated AI control across chillers, pumps, and towers.

Verified savings
19%
Chiller capacity
3 x 3340kW
Controlled scope
Chiller / pump / tower

Mode-split data center

Mode-Split Data Center

A data center plant separated free-cooling and mechanical-cooling modes so each operating state could be measured cleanly.

Free-cooling savings
17.23%
Chiller-mode savings
7.54%
Annual PUE
around 1.2

Phased data center campus

Phased Data Center Campus

A staged data center deployment used transfer reinforcement learning and advisory value push mode to reduce adoption risk.

Verified savings
11.2%
Learning strategy
Transfer RL
Interface mode
Advisory push

Verification method.

Case data is cleaned into a public-safe resource and checked in the browser before release.

Source truth

Operating record

Public-safe resource

Internal fields removed

Validated surface

Browser copy check

Review your cooling plant against these patterns.

Compare your facility performance against this verified deployment set. Our engineering team can provide a tailored feasibility review.